Article first published as Superman, Newsweek, iPad Mini: Three Nails in a Coffin on Technorati.
·
Superman, or rather his mild-mannered alter ego
Clark Kent, quits is decades old job at The Daily Planet to become a
blogger.
·
After 79 years in print Newsweek, begins 2013 as
a digital
only publication. It’s last print edition will hit the stands on December
31 this year.
·
Apple
launches the iPAD Mini…smaller size, smaller price ergo, analysts claim, much
more demand that the earlier, bigger, more expensive editions of the iPAD.
Superman is probably a decade late to blogging, Newsweek
isn’t the first print title to go digital only and the iPad mini is neither the
first at that size, nor the cheapest. Yet these developments are significant as
three nails that signify print publications might be closer to extinction that
many of us believe.
The reason I put the launch of the IPAD Mini up there is
because, I believe, the IPAD Mini will be significant in accelerating the move
from print to online for two very significant reasons: Price and ease of use.
Let’s look at price first. At $329 the mini is the cheapest iPAD ever by almost
$150. Admittedly there are excellent 7-inch tablets at lower rates, but Apple
has demonstrated an ability to move volumes unmatched by any other product. So
the iPAD Mini should see a wave of first time users to the tablet genre.
Second is ease-of-use. I love the Kindle because it has been
engineered for people to read. It is just the right size, the right weight and
has incredibly long battery. The larger tablets, on the other hand, are just a
tad too big and heavy to use for long hours. Smartphones are too small for
anything other than cursory browsing.
Specs
|
Kindle Touch 3G
|
Kindle Fire
|
iPAD Mini
|
Screen Size
|
6”
|
7”
|
7.9”
|
Dimensions (mm)
|
172x119.4x10.1mm
|
190.5x119.4x11.4mm
|
200x134.7x7.2mm
|
Weight (Ounces)
|
7.8
|
14.6
|
10.86
|
While digital is a great way to cut costs and reach a larger
audience, publishers also find that subscription models online do not work as
well as they do in print. Realizations from digital ad revenues are also
nowhere near what publishers have traditionally got from print titles. Even
though digital advertising budgets are
expected to overtake print for the first time this year…the bulk of this is actually
shared by New Media companies.
According comScore
the top 10 online display advertisers in the US are:
·
Facebook
·
Yahoo sites
·
Microsoft sites
·
Google sites
·
AOL Inc
·
Turner Digital
·
Glam Media
·
ESPN
·
Viacom Digital
·
EBay
The real challenge with publications going digital is not
that they are up against sites with huge user bases. It is that they are up
against sites that have incredibly high user engagement levels. Content sites
have been unable to get anywhere near user engagement levels of a Facebook,
Google or Yahoo. I believe user engagement level is directly proportional to ad
revenues.
Site
|
Pageviews/User
|
Time on Site (mm:ss)
|
Bounce Rate%
|
Facebook.com
|
16.41
|
25:49
|
22.7
|
Google.com
|
13.05
|
13:10
|
20.3
|
Yahoo.com
|
6.61
|
8.48
|
31.2
|
CNN.com
|
3.17
|
5.31
|
47.4
|
Parentsconnect.com
|
3.12
|
3.12
|
56%
|
Source: Alexa.com
The point is publishers are trying a variety of different
tactics to create online revenues. I believe the one area that will yield
results will be a greater focus on user engagement levels. There are a number
of ways to do this…not the least to understand user requirements, rather than
just user behavior.
No comments:
Post a Comment